⬇️ What To Look For In Buying   ⬇️ Security & Theft   ⬇️ Where To Ride   ⬇️ The Possible Future Of E-Scooters   ⬇️ The Future Of You   ⬇️ The Copter Conundrum   ⬇️ Paradigm Shift Again   ⬇️ Links!

I monetize nothing online: This is all volunteerism. This may also be TLCR. I'm an influencer; however, my goal is to influence people to stop being mindless consumerists and buying everything they're told & sold. I'm a proponent of anti–consumerism! I want to influence you to influence yourself; to seek within for original thoughts, and not be a cultural automaton; to master critical thinking and get outside the box: E.g. Car–free simple–living! Earth thanks you!
The 2019 pandemic changed many things for most. Prior to that I used my bicycle and Intercity Bus or Rail locally, and Interstate Buses and Amtrak for longer hauls. Driving since 74, I've been volitionally car–free since 2005. By volitionally choosing, not to participate in the car culture, I'm one less person (or a car–free family?) driving the demand for more Heavy Infrastructure, more cars, etc. Then in 2020 with CV–19 Protocols, City Buses postponed service; some Interstate Buses did too.
Since I try to care for others more than self, I had no problem masking and still went out the entire time; no vanity or political cultism here (please, do not become a worshiper of politicians). But, I got attached to online grocery shopping and its home delivery monthly (plus Amazon), and, I did not want to rely, only on City Buses. So I researched micromobility before buying in early 2021. I said NO to accepting sedentary living; I wanted to get around that did not involve the seat to seat lifestyle; ergo, a standing e-scooter!
I still ride my reliable pedal bike (been riding all my life); however, as I'm aging, it is now getting increasingly harder on my butt and back, and so I cannot do the same range as before. The e-scooter has been a godsend for me and others, extending my range, now up to the range limits of the e-scooter itself; I can stand for long periods, far better than sitting.
Here's some Ride Videos and as you'll notice I'm not alongside street dependent businesses much. For obvious reasons the businesses that are car dependent do not like routes that pass them by (e.g. bike trails). There is an entire world off road, be it on bike trails or train trails. The USA was built around the car, and so, that's what most people see and believe is the only place life occurs. That's why the conversation always centers on them; it seems difficult to live without a car, if all one knows of, are the business funnels called streets! But the streets are filled with dangers.
One hazard zone to limit riding in is a 20 yard dome of car traffic (esp. downwind). Cars not only expel carcinogens from tail pipes, but also from tires, brake pad shedding, rust and so on, all along roads. This explains why disease is greater for those in housing built along arterial roads. As cars speed by they kick up dust particles: PM. A mask is recommended when traversing these corridors outside an enclosed vehicle. I frequent off–road trails, and when I exit those I prefer residential roads with little traffic and low speeds. Or I mask!
⬆️ What To Look For In Buying!   This would depend on the individual and their location on Earth, but there's a few things to consider: Will this replace a car? If not, then it's just a toy; you're a weekender; buy whatever you can afford. If you're moneyed, all of these are cheap. However, if you're using it like I do; as your car, along with PT options, then it needs to be dependable, weather resistant, safe, and with long range. Links are peppered throughout for researching these; this page is long because of repeat questions, all answered herein. Research! Knowledge is power!
If this replaces your car, and you must commute to work with it, think of it like a motorcycle, and motorcycle riders in hard winter locales, typically have a car, because it sucks going 30+ MPH in a hard rain. And ice? No way! Add to that a bitter wind chill and I assume you got it. With the best riding gloves, hands still get ice cold, and I double glove. But I do ride year round; one just has to monitor weather, pick the good days, or just live close to work if it is not possible to work from home.
It is better to get an e-scooter that has specs greater than your needs (speed & range), and here's why: Battery life is determined more by charge cycles, not (necessarily) how old they are or how many miles. Therefore, you do not want to have to charge it everyday if you can help it. So, get a unit with great range, even if you ride it infrequently. And get one with good shocks on both wheels, or it will beat you up after long rides. Note also; a thumb or twist throttle is easier to use with thick gloves on, than a finger throttle.
Get one that goes faster than you're average intended speed (my average speed is 27 MPH). Most units have 3 range (or P) settings; slow, medium & fast. Leave it on medium or fast (depending on the unit); then, like every other motorized vehicle, only accelerate to the speed you want: It's not peddle to the metal all the time; no one does that on any other vehicle.
Those settings are not "energy savers" as much as they are speed governors; so, if you go slower in speed, you'll get longer in range. This can be accomplished by controlling your speed with the throttle; same result. Then if you hit heavy car traffic, with no other options, you got the muscle to pace the speed of that traffic. Also, buy e-scooters made for personal use, and not for the rental market, which are App and/or phone dependent. Any e-scooter below a $1000 USD, beware! Trek peddle bikes run from $2400 up to $14K!
Here is the difference between buying from a shop, rather than just a retailer. I bought my first e-scooter from Amazon. When it broke (because of a catastrophic structural failure 🎥), the Ninebot division of Segway, who also sells regionally branded ODM products from their Beijing HQ, naturally stalled, and, it was past Amazon's month return. Buying from Amazon is OK if Seller addresses issues at Amazon; see the Q&A & Comments sections to see if they engage customers or not.
After a full refund from Segway I bought an Emove Cruiser (2021) directly from Voro Motors in LA. The advantage of having a shop, rather than just a product handler like a retailer, is that they unbox all their (direct from China) units, run them a through a check list, to make sure all is well. Then they rebox them and ship them to US customers via UPS or FedEx. If there's any issues, they have techs there in LA, and a repair shop & lots of parts. But, there's a higher price to pay for this, as opposed to buying direct via Alibaba or AliExpress.
My third e-scooter is a Joyor S10-S, also from Amazon; it was discounted (–$250) for a total of $1049 (plus tax), but for the money it's the best scoot I've had so far. But, it came with a burnt out light control module; once on, the deck lights stayed on always thereafter. But they also have people in China that work through Amazon to correct issues, but it's slower. They eventually sent me a module. Then I found a parts supplier for the Joyor S Series.
Currently, all e-scooters are made in China, with hundreds of ODM-OEM factories that most buy from to name brand. However, the largest market for these is still Asia. But the growing Western market is spurring greater interest in their design. They're still garage toys for most Westerners. They are analogous to what the bikes and the bike trail systems are, in a car culture; it's for entertainment purposes, with cars the centerpiece transportation.
However, as more people rely on them for their main transportation option, the quality and longevity of them will need to increase. Then us full timers will have to contend with the car cultists (once again) in the bike space, and the Karen's & Ken's of trail rage. Currently rated as 3 year devices, if one replaced batteries and controllers, alongside the parts that wear on all machines like tires and brakes, one could get more years out of a good one, even on a 300 day annual use cycle.
⬆️ Security & Theft!   Manual & powered portable bolt cutters make quick & quiet work of chains & cables & thin locks. Cables are worthless; a U-lock is better. The best U-locks are expensive, and, if it's locked to a rack or pole that's easier to cut than the U-lock, that's where the cut is made; off goes the e-scooter, lock & all. Many bike racks are thin wall tubes and easy to cut, as in this YouTube video.
If you live where it cannot be kept indoors, it's best not to buy anything too pricey. Leaving a high priced e-scooter (or bike) outside overnight is not wise. But if that's the scenario, you'll want something more sure proof; a GPS tracker inside the battery compartment. It has to be always on because these are often not turned on when stolen; they're lifted into a vehicle. A GPS tracker sends an alert to a phone when such movement takes place.
I have a cheap U-lock; I'm not going to be far from it, and, I park it in my downtown loft apartment foyer. Even this cheap U-lock cannot be cut with a cheap portable bolt cutter; so, they'd have to take a grinder to it, and that would take a lot of time and loud enough to be heard. Thieves see this thick lock and move on. There are two kinds of thieves; pros (geared up planners), and addicts or homeless who look for quick easy steals to pawn.
Most anything can be cut with a grinder, but that's a loud 5 minutes of cutting noises. Thus, the overnight thieves are the geared up pros with a variety of cutting tools, in vans cutting & manually loading them up. They do not ride them, and may not turn them on for some time. Thus, the GPS tracker must be direct wired so it's always on. Air Tags (and others) most thieves already know about; they get busted off almost right away, even sending their presence to a thieves phone.
Here's a YouTube video of a GPS install; by it being permanently installed in the compartment, and with no stickers warning that it's in there, you'll have police on them in hours. They're thieves, not technicians, because if they were techs they'd be earning much money doing that! I think it's vital that all of us arm ourselves with the ability to track & recover our units, otherwise thieves continue undeterred & unpunished. That or plan for increasing future thefts.
⬆️ Where To Ride!   Riding them safely just requires a bit of common sense, and a fair understanding of the physics (or Law) of motion or inertia and gravity. Since I played outside always as a kid, I learned it, real world style, whereas nowadays learning is mostly virtual or two dimensional (screens). One can witness this fact, and repeatedly, by watching fail factory & army, and others. That's why I prefer those that like Skater Parks 🎥: Go!
I do not ride in severe weather, and I always wear helmets. We all know what happens to NFL players running on the ground in $2K helmets; they still suffer from TBI. It's even more important to wear a riding helmet! And helmets look good because they display to everyone that the rider is wise enough to wear one, and, it's a good lifestyle example for the young.
Additionally, I'm in riding gloves and fully dressed for riding, at minimum; a small crash can really skin up the body. If I need to brake suddenly, I squeeze only the back brakes, and also lean back and squat some to shift my weight to that wheel, but also to reduce the tendency to tip over via forward momentum. I also know well, the extreme dangers of cars, so I avoid certain roadways with painted in-street bike lanes, unless car traffic is slow and sparse.
I stay on max 35 MPH posted side roads, with or without painted bike gutters, but there are plenty of bike trails, roads with wide pedestrian ways to ride upon safely, and pedestrian overpasses and under stroad pedestrian crossunders. I get everything delivered to my door, so I'm not packing anything riding. And I can still walk, with a grocer 5 blocks away. And there's always rideshares in emergencies! (More pics of the City and my ride at ImgBB).
As I'm getting older, I am thinking of going where winters are less harsh; somewhere at least South of the arctic dip! The problem with winters is not the cold as much as it is the surface riding conditions: Ice! I do not even go out now when it's too slick, or there's too much snow, which is always plowed into the painted bike lane or gutter :-( And the dedicated bike trails are not plowed regularly like streets are.
While researching e-scooters, I read from a page (in 2019, and at a good shop too: fluidfreeride.com) Some e-scooters today can go very far, actually further than you need them to. After all, who needs to travel 60 miles on an electric kick scooter? The Emove Cruiser will do that. So some of them can achieve very long distances.
The answer to this likely car dependent and/or sedentary person's thinking? There are many (myself included) that would like to go further than 60 miles in range. But the E-Cruiser will not go 60 miles in range, as claimed, under the best of settings, and yet, it still has a range of about 15 miles more than what the G30P achieved. I'm 177# and live in the flat plains of Polk County IA! I regularly make 30 mile round trips; but wouldn't risk 50 miles; not yet anyway.
Still, the only way for anyone to take e-scooters seriously, beyond being garage toys, is when their range can be substantially increased; I'm talking a worst case scenario of 100 miles in range; something like 100 to 150 miles range, at 27 MPH average speed, and if not included, have affordable attachable seat options, which I personally do not use because I sit enough at home.
Imagine buying a car that a full tank of gas has a range of (say) 70 miles before one must get more gas. Yea, that car would not be taken seriously, and few would buy it, except some who might if the price was cheap enough (brand new for $4000); they'd use it as a local range vehicle. Read: How to say goodbye to EV range anxiety!
⬆️ The Possible Future Of Electric Scooters!   What e-scooter designers are currently designing (at least) for the western market, is a type of self–sabotage; they're so focused on speed for the emotional thrill of it, that they're sentencing these devices to the realm of a dangerous toy. Range and dependability, enforced by longer warranties, should be the design target. I'd keep the top speed at 40 MPH. Why?
With greater speed the following things are 100% going to happen; indeed they are already happening! Read also: As E-Bikes Speed Up, a Policy Dilemma Looms.
Once a large enough number of people get killed on standing e-scooters the US Feds will have no choice but to regulate the Industry, at least here in the Ununified States Annexed. The metaphorical brakes will be placed upon them and they'll be literally speed governed. Read: E-scooter Rules Still Varied & Changing Across Europe & E-scooters Are Everywhere In Europe; So Are Grisly Accidents.
Because designers are focusing on making ever faster standing e-scooters, they will eventually be classified as motor vehicles, and require all the same things that motorcycles now require: A drivers license, insurance, tags, taxes, possible tickets, and so on. They will no longer be the same as a bicycle. Then they will lose their appeal. One might as well just buy an unrestricted e-motorcycle.
E-bikes too, will eventually suffer the same fate as/if they get faster, but at least they have larger diameter wheels; hitting a pothole or just a chunk out of the trail pavement, with a 10" diameter wheel going 40 miles per hour, rarely results in a positive outcome. At best it will only damage the tire and/or rim of larger wheeled vehicles. Oh, here's a Youtube video of my e-scooter tire change.
Right now, bicycle groups are now vocally opposing, allowing e-scooters on designated "bike" trails, simply because they go too fast, imposing a risk to both walkers, kids, and bicyclists. And to be honest, it's mostly a few boys who are blazing these bike trials at 40+ miles per hour. It freaks everyone out; even me when I'm cycling there, so I get it!
However, I do not want to lose my current access to these designated trails on my e-scooter, because they are my main roads. By choice, I do not own a car. I made this decision in 2005 for environmental (and personal safety) reasons; I sold my last vehicle the next year and have not owned one since; I've been on State ID's. From that point forward, all my life choices centered around not owning and operating a car.
To own a car is to use a car is to need a car. That's the train of thought in car dependency (it's surely not a logic of thought). Here is how the train goes: I spend enormous amounts of money, buying, maintaining, insuring, repairing, protecting, and being concerned over the ownership of this car device. Therefore, it makes no sense after all this expense and stress, to then walk or ride my bike or micro–mobile to places that I can just drive to. After all, it's faster, (seemingly) safer, and more convenient to do so!
Any logical thinker can see how this is self–inducing. Cars changed so much since I started driving in 1974, when we paid for cars outright (I never knew anyone who took out a car loan); there was no mandatory insurance, gas was cheap, and cars were easy to fix by the owner. Plus, there were not nearly as many drivers on the roads; I never once had a wreck. I broke free of my addiction to oil consumption (in 05) for safety and environmental reasons.
Today's investment in them is huge, so it's understandable why people say "to hell with it" and just drive everywhere always. However, the environmental issues are compounding. This is why money economics will be the end of us; it monetizes virtually everything, and that is fully unsustainable. And most people judge all things only in dollar increments.
In the USA, car is king, whereas, bikes are more for exercise and leisure. Therefore, micro–mobile devices are not needed, and are even a nuisance on bike designated zones; trails as well as on the car street's painted bike lanes. When I ride my e-scooter on the streets people yell out to get off the road, and when I'm on the bike trails they yell out to get off the trail and onto the roads.
Still, I'm hopeful that by being the change I want to see in the world, others will follow that example. I cycle for short distances, but an e-scooter is a range extending mobility assistant for many. If rural I'd have a Fat Tire Electric Scooter. Living with too many potholes the 15" wheeled Dualtron City is a great option. Another in the electric bike world are Etrikes; some of the Etrikes are designed to be used by the wheel chair dependent.
Building a waterproof battery powered scooter or bike, is such a no brainier that if someone told me there were no waterproof units at all, I would not initially believe that. It is so hard to believe still (circa 2023) that I thought I'd demonstrate how it can (and will) be done, in the hopes of those who actually design them will read this. Scooters (and all such devices) should be as waterproof as electric or gas motorcycles already are.
Without too many details, it would have a waterproof battery box; the access door would have a rubber O-ring, typical of many other such applications. All the ports that connect the inside of the box to the outside components, would simply be waterproof plugs, like you find on submersible equipment; the external components would be analogous to waterproof action cameras.
Unlike how the monkey see & monkey do copycats mimic current bad designs, in my design, there would be no wrapped wire harnesses running through drilled holes into the box that are then basically caulk sealed; that design gets an "F" from this Designer. All the components needed already exist; they'd just have to be slightly redesigned for e-scooter application.
⬆️ The Future Of You!   Born in 1958, I might not be around when the ecological crap hits the big fan a decade or so from now. So why did I make this decision? For future generations; for you; to be a model to the youth around me. And yet, most of them merely find my lifestyle choices humorous; an outlier; a curiosity! Still, the truly concerned will take the important time to read and understand why, at a philosophical and resource rich site titled Car Cult.
For any electric scooter (or Ebike) to be taken seriously, especially as a replacement to a car, two things must take priority; range is number one, and the second is the durability and dependability of the device itself. Once these are built with serious intention, that reality will reflect itself in the factory warranties, just like it happened with the automobile industry.
For most of my life, all automobile warranties were 1 year, sometimes with 2 years on the main power train only. With quality improvements, some automakers have a factory 5 year warranty, as opposed to an insurance addendum which can be bought for almost anything nowadays. That is because they build them better, and can confidently offer it.
A factory warranty is the open testimony of a manufactures confidence in their products; every company will claim their brand is the best, so that's expected. But a 1 year warranty on anything is humorous, but it is also telling; it's the manufacturer accepting that they make low quality items and thus cannot afford to put their money where their mouth is.
And once the Automobile Industry and Big Oil begins to feel threatened by more efficient and safe forms of Micro Mobility, they will, once again, covertly invest heavily in exposing their flaws (including those mentioned herein) as viable replacements to their resource gluttonous SUVs & trucks and other urban tanks: And I'd wager the $ value of those Industries on that!
Simply put, smaller lighter vehicles would not need all the current, carbon centered and expensive Heavy Infrastructure. But the explanation for why it will not happen is simple; those in the micromobility industry, in the West and at least so far, are more interested in short term profits than being agents of change, as a long-term solution to the current ravages of the car culture.
Everyone who has read and understood the page dedicated to the Car Cult, knows that those ravages go far beyond the billions of IC engines, from the smallest to the largest of them, globally billowing countless megatons of carcinogens from refined fossil fuels, poisoning the biosphere. Obviously we cannot all be homeless, but we can all be carless; just refer to your ancestors, before 1940!
⬆️ The Copter Conundrum!   My ride is a two seat ultralight helicopter. As a licensed pilot, this unit cost $160K which is about the same as my favorite car. My office building only has parking for 6 ultralights. As more are getting licensed and buying units, parking them is now becoming problematic. If I were forced to drive a car it's a 4 hour commute one way; that's unacceptable! Therefore, we're petitioning our City to build more heliport parking, by adding heliports to all capable top floor parking structures and high rise buildings; with public funding this should be feasible, just as with cars. We cannot return to driving; it takes too long!
This conversation is a real Executive exchange (modified for effect). The point of it? To show how options and choices shape our mentality. Most of us cannot afford a personal copter, and so we never even consider living a 4 hour one-way car drive from a job. However, if your transportation unit only takes a half hour then living that far away is a non issue. You see, everything is relative!
And it is the exact same thing with cars versus micro–mobile. If all you have is a micro–mobile device (bikes too), then you shape your lifestyle around that paradigm, and without even pondering such exceptions mentioned herein. Since you cannot own or operate a copter (or a car), such an item is not even in your calculations, nor your mentality. And it is the mindset at focus herein. If you do not (or will not) own a car, you will shape how you live accordingly.
The social media responses to this whining Executive (pilot) was not friendly. He got hammered for thinking that he was privileged; special; exclusive; exceptional; supreme; in a word, entitled! But to him, he is just an Executive with a copter; he compares his copter with coworkers; the typical "mine's better than yours" immaturity! It happens with all consumer products. The value of those products is relative to ones resources.
And I'm sure this Executive feels mildly bad for all us lowly people, who must commute in street traffic, to and fro. But hey, that's just Capitalistic Way: Too bad for you if you are not in its fast lane. After all, only high quality people reach the pinnacles of privilege. The quantity of USD is the only true barometer of self–worth to the capitalistic. Everyone's created equal my ass!
The moral of the (copter) story should be obvious by now. Anything can be justified; any lifestyle, or any purchases within it. Everything is a matter of perspective; everything is a matter of opportunity. We all navigate with what we have and/or can obtain. And we reject all else, openly or quietly.
To those who are perhaps jealous, they have a completely different take on this, than (say) an environmentally conscious person who would not burn gasoline into the biosphere, no matter how much money they possess; who would not put another car on the Heavy Infrastructure, regardless of how many others do so; cannot justify risking life over any point A to B trip.
Obviously, there would not be a need for the many billions of miles of Heavy Infrastructure, if all there were to support, such a now global network, were a few million vehicles globally upon them. And so, numbers "is" the game. If everyone stopped buying cars and started buying personal copters, the entire infrastructure budget would shift a lot: It would have to! Demand drives supply!
But then, that would only change the way people kill each other, while merely going from point A to B. I often wonder where people were going after they just mangled a human body (too often children) with their cars. I'm curious if they thought this collateral damage was acceptable. Then they get into another one and go as if nothing serious happened. They drive cars to the funerals of people who died in cars! That confirms my suspicions; that's sinister indeed!
⬆️ Paradigm Shift Again!   Another great advantage of moving away from huge machines is also in the stunningly massive Heavy Infrastructure needed to support them all. From roads and bridges, to parking lots and structures, and the concrete and asphalt that is now choking the surface of Earth; this is causing a host of secondary problems that now outnumber the initial car-cult catastrophe itself. Heavy Infrastructure is also a resource intensive maintenance leviathan, long after it's built: e.g. snow removal. Humans should never need to move snow!
Heavy Infrastructure is the need for a system that supports vehicles over a 1/2 ton (453 kg) net weight: In the US, it is designed for supporting vehicles in the 40 ton range. So Heavy Infrastructure differs greatly from Light (LI), based upon what uses it. A sidewalk system or bike trails are examples of light infrastructure. So is MagLev and other Elevated Railways. They do not interfere too much with the natural world allowed to blossom and traverse underneath.
The need for a multi trillion dollar Heavy Infrastructure system, is insane. "Freedom" (unfortunately) has degraded into: I do what the hell I want, where & whenever I want, and to hell with the consequences to others! Such exhibitions of a mental anomaly, must first be acknowledged, and then dealt with accordingly. Unfortunately there are still no laws against stupidity. The Car Cult already kills 2 million humans globally each year (WHO; 1.3 of that are just crashes); that's expected to go up.
Car dependency is like any other dependency, in that those dependent will continue to make excuses for it, no matter how much reason opposing it is applied. All this must/will be rejected, and for the same reason a debate about the ideas of flat earth are, while posting on a flat earth site; all reason would be rejected by flat earth folk. Without humility, once a person has convinced themselves it's too hard to be freed from that (pride) bondage. If a person can only see what's in front of them, then sure, no problem will be solved by the same mentality that created it to begin with. One has to either think outside–the–box, or find contentment within its confinement.
Unfortunately, too many humans like to be victims (e.g. I'm a victim of city design or infrastructure); being a victim comes with many social and cultural perks. Since the entire human species lived well on Earth without cars – from the beginning of our species existence all the way until the 1930s in the USA and the 1970s in the rest of the westernized Earth – this alone is sufficient evidence (though that's surely not all) that humans can live without cars today, and all the way into the 25th century if our species wills it. Therefore, all human dependency, no matter what it is, centers on the volition to remain dependent, versus confession and change.
The automobile devotees will try to pass the buck via blame–shifting. Rather than giving up their car addiction, they react to that internal guilt and its cognitive dissonance, by simple diversion; that the blame goes to governments or the corporations, just like it was/is with tobacco or any other harmful addictive thing on Earth. It's someone else that must be blamed but me; I am the victim here! That is the scapegoat, but since most people are also addicts and victims, there's plenty of support for the victim stance.
Therefore, the entire debate surrounding the topic of the Car Cult, is almost never about just quitting cars; just like it is with all addictions, it will always center on self–justification and rationalization first. I often offer a little ditty about the gun owning parents:
Paranoid and fearful, they keep a loaded handgun in the drawer of their bedside table. They have 7 children; one of them shot themselves accidentally and died; they grieved, had a funeral, but then reloaded the gun and put in back in the drawer. Then a month later another child shot herself and died; they had a funeral, reloaded the gun and put it back into the drawer. Then a few months pass and a third child shot himself and died. They repeated the process.
Now, whenever I tell this ditty, everyone (I mean everyone) immediately says something to the effect: get rid of the gun; it is not saving lives, it is killing those that the parents were trying to protect with it to begin with! Like it is with guns, start selling hand grenades and watch the death toll skyrocket! Logic says: If you can't buy them you can't use them! It's called logical regulation, and true leaders would have abolished the US 2nd Amendment long ago.
All this is Truth! But then, I'll tell them a similar ditty, only this time, I use a metal weapon that kills more than guns by many thousands to one: the Car! Parents will bury their young that died by car; they will drive by car to the funeral and the grave, and then on their way back home, they gas it up, park it, and continue on with it, still as a clear and present danger, especially to teens!
Well, but that's different! We must have a car to exist! That's what the automobile devotees must & will say! Then I ask if they believe there were no humans that survived before the mass production of the automobile, and yet more justifications come out. But as with all dead–end self–justifications, they just get more bizarre sounding, the deeper down that rabbit hole one goes; it's just like with modern right/left politics! But rational solutions abound for those with an open heart and thus open mind.
Streets are for people; it's time we give them back! We must also ban personal cars on the US Interstate system and modify those corridors to build a fleet of passenger elevated systems that are powered by a perpetual solar array, all along those corridors. Replace the current mega heavy diesel powered generators with a "direct from source" system, utilizing much lighter train cars, and shorter runs of train cars, and more of them more frequently. We must separate passenger from freight to eliminate all risks.
Personal Vehicles would have speed limits and range limits. The ridiculously spoiled humans who suffer from victimism would have to be forced to adapt to a more peaceful lifestyle; the slow movement. That, or we just allow them to continue on this path until Earth can no longer sustain mammals. Obviously, at peak oil, if there's not a better plan in place, humans will not be able to produce even a tenth of current food production. Guess what happens then?
We must reassess how neighborhoods are designed; we must abandon car–centric design–builds! Think of the increase in wildfires, droughts and urban flooding everywhere. Imagine an infrastructural paradigm without big cars in mind; upgrades for areas already ruined by poorly planned urbanization. Answer this: Car Crashes Cause Death, Injury & Trauma: Why Do We Shrug Them Off? Here are Six Promises You Can Make to Help Reduce Carbon Emissions.
Ponder a designed living that's car free; also the ideas proposed at City Lab. Plan out how you are going to live, minus a personal car. That will determine where you work, live, and how you live. Show your kids, by your lifestyle choices, how much you care for their future on Earth. Otherwise, Armageddon is as assured (prophetically) as will be, the denial of it, till the bitter end. See the thoughtful Car Cult YouTube Series.

Share On FacebookOn TwitterOn LinkedIn     ⬆️

🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴

Rider Guide (Sponsored)GT King Store (CH)Flaming Wheel Store (CH)Joyor at TodiMartTeverun USASolar ScootersSnow E-Scooters4-Wheel E-BikeseCargo VehiclesBicyclists, Pedestrians & Micromobility (GHSA)Transportation AlternativesOno MotionSmart Cities DiveElectric BrandsElectro HeadsBicycling.comTrek's 2-Kid Cargo E-Bike
🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥 🎥
Inside Alien RidesInside Rev RidesInside Voro MotorsInside Mini MotorsInside Fluid Free RideInside KaaboEbike SchoolRK9 RidesRoadRunnerE-Scooter GuideWrong WayNotJustBikes

🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴 🛴

My Reddit